Skip to main content

Medit: Everything wrong with "interesting"

I had a English professor who would roll her eyes at students who said "interesting" when discussing reading assignments: "I think this passage is so interesting" or "This poem is more interesting than the others" or what have you. She'd needle the students with "What does that even mean?" It's lost its meaning, the accusation goes; it's vacuous, it offers no substance, it does little if any work, and so on.

Before writing this post, I reflected on this word's problems over on Twitter. The trouble is finding good alternatives, which has baffled me in the past, likely because I hadn't really bothered to figure it all out. As such, I decided to blog about it!

It's important to note that it isn't necessarily wrong to say "interesting." It's just better to avoid it if one can.

I still use it now and then in conversation, and I'm sure you will, too, even after reading this post. It signals what's called "valence"; loosely, that one does or doesn't like something for some reason. But it doesn't really say what that reason is or why it matters, which is why it's best to work around this particular word when possible—especially in writing!

When we say "interesting," it's usually just falling from our mouths or onto the page without any critical thinking behind it. Which is where the problem really lies: thinking, or a lack of it. Hopefully this post helps you get past that problem and leads to better writing!


We use it without thinking. 

Unlike "impactful," a back formation that is imprecise and therefore easily corrected with more precise choices, "interesting" is perhaps more accurately described as lazy.

So what to do about laziness? Well for one, be more thoughtful! In other words, think through what you're trying to say, and try to say it more clearly and directly.

For example, the easy route is to consult any old thesaurus for other options. And that certainly works—as a first step. As with any synonym, care needs to be taken to find the right one; "provocative" and "beautiful" are not the same thing, but they're both synonyms for "interesting."

The next step in finding your alternative might be to elaborate what you were trying to say in the first place. Change it to "This is interesting because...," and then be as specific as possible in filling in the "because" clause. "This is interesting because I like it" adds little value, whereas "...because I like the word choice" is getting somewhere.


What specifically is so interesting?

Maybe the word choice made you stop and think, maybe it made you look at the words in new ways, or maybe you'd just never heard of that word before. So perhaps "thought-provoking," "refreshing," or "unusual" would work better than boring old "interesting."

In my opinion, though, stopping there isn't much better than where you started: "This word choice is refreshing" doesn't tell readers much that's useful. Is it like lemonade on a hot day or like a web page in your browser? Both "refresh," but probably not in the way you're thinking!

So how was it refreshing? It could help if you bring back the "because" clause that got you started: "This word choice is refreshing because it made me look at those words in new ways." Now the reader has a better idea what you mean by "refreshing." And the more you elaborate from there—which words, what new ways you saw them, and why you want to talk about them at all—the more you'll tell your reader.


And that'll make you interesting.



Photo by music4life on Pixabay.

Other posts of interest

Review: FTL, Y'all!, eds. Trotman and Lafrenais

This past summer, I read FTL, Y'all! Tales From the Age of the $200 Warp Drive , a sci-fi anthology of graphic short stories edited by C. Spike Trotman and Amanda Lafrenais. Because I finished it less recently than not, I'll keep this review short. Perhaps most of all, I loved the diversity and representation among these stories. People of color, LGBTQ, protagonists from various backgrounds with varied goals, and more. The stories were imaginative, too, with no two quite like each other. All good for an anthology in my opinion. That said, it is an anthology, so it has its ups and downs; not all stories in it are created equal. While on the one hand, that's the basis of its variety, it underpins both its rewards—and its short comings. There were a good many stories I genuinely loved, and even among the ones I loved less, there were several I still found thought provoking and felt were still very much worth having read. And those I really didn't click with? It may ...

Happy to be back

I like to joke that that copy editing is the nerdiest part of publishing and certainly the geekiest kind of editing. So why do I do it? What do I get out of it? Aside from being an unabashed nerd myself, I enjoy a good puzzle. I always have. Who doesn't like cross-referencing facts? Who doesn't love checking tenses and pronouns? Who doesn't enjoy sifting through line after line, hunting for errors and missteps, and verifying style rules? Okay, maybe a lot of people don't, but I do. It's a puzzle every time; examining every piece, checking the gems for flaws, mending and finessing the handiwork of others as gently but rigorously as possible... Image by surut wattanamaetee For a while, I tried other kinds of editing, but copy editing has always been the most satisfying—I get lost in it, adore it. So it's little wonder I've wandered back into it after other careers didn't pan out. I've previously considered freelancing as a copy editor (hence setting...